Crypto Research Labs
EN ▾
GitHub

← All hypotheses

H-019: Everscale (EVER): hold only while BTC is above its 200-day average

Weak  Family: trend · Status: weak

Does Bitcoin's 200-day average help time Everscale (EVER)? The idea did a bit better than simply buying and holding, but not by enough to rule out luck. Treat it as unproven.

Result

since_listing: wins 0/1 (need 1), beats buy-and-hold 1/1

Sharpe: return per unit of risk (higher is better). CAGR: average yearly growth. Max drawdown: worst fall from a peak. p-value: chance the result is luck (lower is better). “Hold” columns are buy-and-hold for the same asset and days. Glossary

AssetPeriodSharpeHold SharpeCAGRHold CAGRMax drawdownHold drawdownIn marketp-valueBeats holdCounts as win
EVERUSDTsince_listing (2022-06-01 → 2026-10-13)0.12-0.17-37.0%-69.5%-97.6%-99.7%57%0.187yesno

Equity curves

Growth of 1 unit, log scale, fees included. Only days on which the rule is fully defined are counted.

The same rule on every coin

Exploratory check of this rule on all coins since 2022-01-01. It is not part of the verdict above.

Coin✓ResultSharpe: rule / holdingCAGRFrom
BTC↑better than holding, could be luck0.93 / 0.48+29% / +12%2022-01-01
ETH↑better than holding, could be luck0.63 / 0.20+20% / -9%2022-01-01
SOL↑better than holding, could be luck0.81 / 0.35+37% / -10%2022-01-01
BNB↑better than holding, could be luck0.68 / 0.42+21% / +8%2022-01-01
XRP↑better than holding, could be luck0.75 / 0.51+35% / +10%2022-01-01
ADA↑better than holding, could be luck0.32 / -0.01+0% / -32%2022-01-01
LTC↑better than holding, could be luck0.26 / 0.11-1% / -18%2022-01-01
LINK↑better than holding, could be luck0.43 / 0.30+7% / -10%2022-01-01
DOGE↑better than holding, could be luck0.39 / 0.26+5% / -15%2022-01-01
XLM↑better than holding, could be luck0.56 / 0.30+19% / -9%2022-01-01
TRX✗worse than holding0.54 / 0.74+20% / +36%2022-01-01
EVER↑better than holding, could be luck0.10 / -0.15-39% / -68%2022-03-19
GRAM✗worse than holding-0.15 / 0.13-23% / -17%2023-03-14

Why it might work

Requested by F1DevBin. Same idea as H-017 applied to EVER: small-cap coins depend on the overall crypto regime, which BTC's 200-day trend captures. Gate.io data, fee 0.2% per side; thin liquidity caveat as in H-018.

Verdict history

Pre-registered specification

kind: timing_rule
rule:
  type: asset_above_sma
  asset: BTCUSDT
  window: 200
mode: long_flat
fee: 0.002
universe:
- EVERUSDT
periods:
- name: since_listing
  start: '2022-06-01'
significance:
  method: circular_shift
  n: 2000
  alpha: 0.05
criterion:
  min_wins:
    since_listing: 1
  require_significance: true